Xt4b vs the alternatives

Five honest comparisons. Five tools that come up in the same conversation as Xt4b.

Clearscope, Surfer SEO, MarketMuse, Frase, GrowthBar — each one gets its own page, with real pricing, real integration lists, and an honest list of where Xt4b does and does not win. Pick the tool you are evaluating today; the verdict names the team shape the comparison fits.

Five individual comparisons.

Pick a competitor to read the full page. Each page has the same shape: what the tool is, where it wins, where it doesn't, what it costs, who should pick it.

Compare like for like.

Four questions, asked of every tool. Where a cell is empty, the tool does not have that capability — not a missing tick.

ModelPlans before writingDrafts the postSchedules publishingPricing
ClearscopeInventory onlyBuilt in
Surfer SEOTopical MapBuilt inSite Audit
MarketMuseInventory + BriefBuilt inBuilt in
FraseBuilt inBuilt inTone of Voice controls
GrowthBarKeyword-drivenBuilt inSeparate per languageBuilt in
Xt4bBuilt inEnd to endBuilt in€10 / site / language

What it costs at scale.

One year of the cheapest paid plan on each tool, for a team of five editors running one site in two languages — the shape most SEO teams actually are.

ToolCheapest plan with core featureAnnual cost (1 site / 2 langs / 5 seats)Includes publishing?
ClearscopeEssentials $189 / seat$11,340No
Surfer SEOEssential $129 / seat$7,740No
MarketMuseStandard $149 / seat + Credits$8,940 + CreditsNo
FraseTeam $114.99 / seat$6,899.40No
GrowthBarStandard $65 / site$780 (1 site / 2 langs)Yes (limited languages)
Xt4b€10 / site / language€240 (€120 × 2 langs)Yes

Which one is actually for you.

Six rules of thumb, one per competitor and one for Xt4b. The list you actually want when you are choosing between a tool and the next six months of work.

Questions about choosing.

The ones that come up before the budget conversation starts.

Are these comparisons biased toward Xt4b?

Each /vs page lists where the competitor does something Xt4b does not, then names the team shape that should pick the competitor. The matrix is the same six dimensions across all five pages so the comparison is like-for-like, and the verdict names who should pick the competitor.

Do you have an integration with the tool we already use?

Not directly. Xt4b produces the brief and ships the post; the draft itself is written in whatever editor your writer prefers — usually the existing tool's editor or a Google Doc. Moving the brief to Xt4b does not mean giving up the existing tool.

Which one is the cheapest for a one-person blog?

Xt4b, at €10 per site per language per month, plus a free scan. The others all charge per seat, which is fine for a team but expensive for one person — and the cost of a solo Xt4b account stays flat no matter how many posts you publish.

What if our bottleneck is grading drafts, not writing them?

Pick the tool that grades drafts — Clearscope or Surfer. Xt4b is the wrong fit when grading is the bottleneck; the bottleneck Xt4b removes is having a draft on the right date in the first place.

More on content

Put it next to the alternatives

Run Xt4b next to whichever tool you already use.

Create an account, connect a domain, and watch the first plan land right next to the comparison page you just read. Nothing publishes until a date you approved comes around.